In
HP today announced that it will exhibit a diverse showcase of flat-bed and roll-to-roll large format printers designed to expand the sign and display applications offering of print service providers (PSPs) m.com/byung-ho-park-twins-jersey/" target="_blank">Byung-Ho Park Jersey , at Viscom Spain, 17 – 19 October, Madrid, Hall 10, Stand lighting the continued importance of HP Latex Ink Technologies m.com/byron-buxton-twins-jersey/" target="_blank">Byron Buxton Jersey , and the Exam1passbusiness-enhancing opportunities it offers users, HP will display some of the vibrant, wide-ranging applications achievable, while offering live product demonstrations on key HP Latex devices, including the award-winning HP Designjet L28500 Printer and HP Scitex exam LX850 Printer.
In this section I explore in depth the specific problems that led learners to incorrect responses on the FCT. Each incorrect response was coded as stemming from problem 1 (misidentification of syntactic slot) m.com/brian-dozier-twins-jersey/" target="_blank">Brian Dozier Jersey , problem 2 (misclassification of the target word(s)), or a combination of the two. For some responses, there was insufficient information to determine the source of the error; again, these responses were coded as NI. There were a total of 255 errors made by the 35 participants; Table 4 presents the distribution of these errors according to the categories described above.
As seen in Table 4, problem 1 (M = 3.97) was more prevalent than problem 2 (M = 1.71). A paired samples’ r-test confirms that this difference is statistically significant ((34) = 6.6 m.com/bert-blyleven-twins-jersey/" target="_blank">Bert Blyleven Jersey , p < 0.005). Thus, a majority of learners’ word class errors stem from the inability to determine which type of word that can fill a given slot or frame. Example 19, in which the correct form is the adjective activos ‘active’, illustrates this problem. A different type of problem stems from learners’ misclassification of one or both of the target words. In these cases, the learner appears to have solved problem 1 (i.e. heshe knows what type of word can or cannot fill the slot) m.com/hats/" target="_blank">Authentic Twins Hats , but does not recognise the options as belonging to that category. The following example, in which the learner attempts to decode item 16, clearly illustrates this problem. This verbal report indicates that the learner knows heshe needs a noun to fill the slot, but doesn’t see either of the options as fitting that category. In fact, many learners did not recognise peleas as a noun but rather as the tu form of the verbpelear ‘to fight’. The learner in example (21) eliminatesterza as an option after having categorised it as a verb.3 Not recognising fuerza as a noun form is indicative of problem 2 (misclassification). However m.com/t-shirts/" target="_blank">Authentic Twins T-Shirts , the syntactic slot has also been misidentified; the learner seems to know that fuerte is an adjective (‘it’s describing it’), yet does not realise that only a noun can appear to the right of fife (‘of’).
The first research question was exploratory in nature: What kinds of cues do L2 learners attend to when presented with a word class contrast The data gathered from concurrent and retrospective think-aloud protocols reveal nine main cues, which were grouped into three broad categories: semantic cues, grammatical cues, and external cues. Learners focused on grammatical cues most frequently [url=http://